Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, continues to be the subject of extensive research to improve patient care. Recently, scientists have developed an innovative patch made of nanofibers, which could soon enrich the therapeutic arsenal against psoriasis. Learn more here about this promising advancement and how it stands out from current treatments.
- Carnet
- Skin Concerns
- A nanofiber patch as a new treatment for psoriasis?
A nanofiber patch as a new treatment for psoriasis?
- Nanofiber Patch: A Breakthrough in Psoriasis Treatment?
- Are there limitations to the use of this nanofiber patch?
- Sources
Nanofiber Patch: A Breakthrough in Psoriasis Treatment?
Psoriasis is a chronic disease primarily expressed through skin and joint symptoms, affecting approximately 2% of the global population. It manifests as red patches covered with white scales, the intensity of which varies among individuals. Although numerous treatments for psoriasis are available on the market, their effectiveness is often compromised by a lack of patient adherence, particularly due to the inconvenience of repeated applications of creams, which are often deemed impractical. In response to this issue, a team of researchers from the University of Copenhagen has developed a nanofiber patch that could improve the management and daily life of individuals affected by psoriasis.
This patch utilizes a technology known as electrospinning, which allows for the creation of a nanofiber mat capable of delivering active ingredients directly into the skin in a controlled manner. Unlike existing patches that merely protect psoriasis plaques and prevent scratching, this device stands out due to its multilayer design and the integration of two active ingredients: salicylic acid and hydrocortisone.
This patch is structured into three functional layers. The first, in direct contact with the skin, is infused with salicylic acid, a keratolytic agent that works quickly to eliminate dead cells. The second layer contains hydrocortisone, strategically placed to allow for extended release, aiming to soothe redness and inflammation. Finally, a protective outer layer, composed of polycaprolactone, a biocompatible polymer, holds everything in place while protecting the other layers from external aggressions, such as friction or moisture.
Beyond its innovative nanofiber structure, this patch is primarily intriguing due to the sequential nature of its active ingredient release, as confirmed in a test conducted in vitro.
The fibers containing salicylic acid demonstrated a rapid release, with over 70% of the salicylic acid being released within the first hour. This effect, known as burst release, is due to the location of the salicylic acid in the outer layer of the fibers, which facilitates its immediate contact with the external environment. This property is particularly suited for its keratolytic role, aimed at quickly eliminating dead cells on the skin's surface.
On the other hand, hydrocortisone has shown a gradual and prolonged release. In the first hour, about 40% of the hydrocortisone was released, followed by a continuous diffusion reaching 80% after three days and 90% after a week. This delayed release is explained by the placement of the hydrocortisone in an inner layer of the fibers, protected by the outer layers. These layers act as a diffusion barrier and allow for a gradual release of the hydrocortisone.
The sequential release of active ingredients allows for a more efficient and simplified management for the patient, with only a single daily application of the patch.
Furthermore, in order to verify that the active ingredients of the patch were properly absorbed by the skin, the researchers conducted skin permeation tests on samples of dorsal pig skin and compared the results to those obtained with "standard" creams containing 3% salicylic acid and 1% hydrocortisone. It was shown that the fiber patch allowed for greater penetration of hydrocortisone into the epidermis and dermis, estimated at 4.5% for each layer, compared to less than 1.5% for the standard cream. As for salicylic acid, the permeation of this active ingredient was similar between the patch and the ointment. This result is not surprising, however, as the released salicylic acid is supposed to remain primarily on the skin's surface and perform a keratolytic role.
However, this increase in the permeation of hydrocortisone into the various layers of the skin raises an important question: is the risk of systemic side effects higher compared to creams? Although hydrocortisone is a common active ingredient in the therapeutic arsenal against psoriasis, increased absorption could heighten the frequency and intensity of adverse effects, particularly in cases of prolonged or repeated use. Therefore, it would be beneficial for additional studies to be conducted to assess these potential risks.
Finally, the anti-inflammatory effect of this patch was tested in vitro. For this, the nanofibers of the patch were co-cultured with human keratinocytes for 24 and 48 hours. The levels of IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, were measured before and after, and a significant decrease in this molecule was recorded over time. These results allow us to suppose that this patch could significantly reduce skin inflammation.
This nanofiber patch could therefore have real potential in the treatment of psoriasis.
Furthermore, beyond psoriasis, this device has potential applications for other dermatoses, such as the eczema. The ability to modulate active ingredients and their release also opens up interesting prospects in the field of wound healing, by recreating environments conducive to skin regeneration. However, although the results are promising, several steps remain necessary before it can be made available to patients and clinical trials still need to be conducted to validate the effectiveness and safety of the patch on groups of patients suffering from psoriasis.
Are there limitations to the use of this nanofiber patch?
However, if this patch were indeed to become a reality, one might question its practicality, particularly for patients with multiple psoriasis plaques on their body. In addition to the potentially unattractive appearance it could create, this solution could be costly for these individuals as it would require the use of multiple patches. Another question arises regarding the size of the patches and their adaptability to psoriasis plaques of varying sizes and irregular shapes. Depending on the extent of the patients' condition, their practical use could be limited, particularly if multiple patches are needed to cover a single lesion. Furthermore, their compatibility with certain areas frequently affected by psoriasis, such as the scalp where plaques are often thick and hard to reach, remains an open question.
Finally, the time required to release all of the hydrocortisone, which spans several days, is not ideal. Considering that each patch will likely need to be replaced after each shower, swim, or workout session, it's understandable that a portion of the hydrocortisone from the patches will be lost and not absorbed into the skin. A complete release of the hydrocortisone within eight hours of application would be optimal and would allow patients to apply the patch in the evening, before going to sleep, and remove it the following morning.
This new treatment raises several questions that would need to be explored in the upcoming optimization studies planned by the researchers.
Sources
KUMAR S. & al. Psoriasis: A review of existing therapies and recent advances in treatment. Journal of Rational Pharmacotherapeutics & Research (2018).
HEINZ A. & al. Electrospun dressings with a dual release functionality of two anti-inflammatory active ingredients. RSC Pharmaceutics (2024).
HEINZ A. & al. Electrospun fiber patches for inflammatory skin diseases – Correlating in vitro drug release with ex vivo permeation. Biomaterials Advances (2025).
Diagnostic
Understand your skin
and its complex needs.