The squalane has an oily, nourishing texture, similar to that of plant oils. This richness often leads to questions about its compatibility with oily or acne-prone skin. Yet, squalane does not seem to clog the pores, nor promote comedone formation.
Several studies have shown that squalane is non-comedogenic, unlike squalene, whose unsaturated structure makes it susceptible to oxidation.
Indeed, it is the oxidation products of squalene, known as squalene peroxides, that have a proven comedogenic potential and contribute to the inflammation observed in acne-prone skin. An experimental study specifically compared the comedogenicity of six lipid substances, including squalene and squalane, on the ventral skin of rabbit ears—a model frequently used to assess the comedogenic potential of cosmetic actives. The researchers evaluated both pre- and post-UVA irradiation effects, as well as the lipid peroxidation rate.
The results showed that UVA-irradiated squalene became highly comedogenic, with a significant formation of comedones associated with follicular hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, whereas squalane, even when exposed to UVA, did not induce any comedonal lesions. Moreover, the lipid peroxidation level was markedly increased for squalene but remained unchanged for squalane, confirming the latter’s chemical stability. This stability explains why squalane is not prone to oxidation and does not generate irritating, comedogenic peroxides. The study therefore demonstrates that only unsaturated lipids, such as squalene or oleic acid, become comedogenic after oxidation, in contrast to saturated lipids like squalane.