Stress and rosacea.
The rosacea is a chronic inflammatory facial dermatosis characterized by persistent redness, flushing episodes, and telangiectasias, resulting from vascular and neuro-inflammatory dysregulation. The stress could act as a trigger or exacerbating factor by inducing flushing episodes: under the influence of adrenaline released by the autonomic nervous system, cutaneous vessels dilate, increasing facial blood flow and causing redness. Repeated episodes may result in a loss of vascular tone and permanent vessel dilation. Moreover, the concurrent activation of cutaneous mast cells and the release of vasoactive and pro-inflammatory mediators under the influence of stress hormones, such as corticotropin-releasing factor, may amplify local inflammation and contribute to telangiectasias that are persistent and characteristic of rosacea.
Building on this, a 2017 clinical study investigated whether psychological stress preceded symptom worsening in patients with rosacea. Sixteen participants rated their daily stress on a 0–10 scale via questionnaires while recording in a diary the presence of papules or pustules, the intensity of redness, and burning sensations. The results showed that 12 of the 16 patients exhibited a association between higher stress levels and increased severity of skin symptoms. To date, this study represents one of the few clinical investigations directly exploring the link between stress and rosacea. However, the very small sample size precludes drawing firm conclusions, and further research involving a larger number of participants remains necessary.
Stress and skin cancers.
The link between stress and skin cancers is now the focus of growing interest, even though the evidence remains partial. Experimental studies suggest that stress might promote tumor onset, progression, or spread, notably by modulating immunity and inflammation. For example, prolonged activation of the stress axis and the release of glucocorticoids can inhibit certain functions of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, essential for antitumor surveillance, and create a more permissive microenvironment for the development of tumors such as melanoma. Other proposed mechanisms include activation of molecular pathways related to hypoxia, angiogenesis, or epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which may increase the invasive and metastatic potential of tumor cells.
Stress may also play a more direct role in the metastatic cascade. Animal models show that chronic stress exposure is associated with a increase in pulmonary metastases and elevated levels of stress hormones, while certain catecholamines such as norepinephrine can stimulate tumor angiogenesis and the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators. Conversely, some findings occasionally suggest a slowdown in tumor growth depending on the timing and nature of the stress, highlighting a complex relationship that depends on the biological context rather than a single linear effect.
Finally, multiple lines of evidence suggest that stress could reduce the effectiveness of antitumor immune responses and certain immunotherapies, by decreasing the activity of T cells and dendritic cells or by altering the expression of immune regulatory molecules. Similar effects have been reported for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, where chronic stress may diminish the recruitment of protective lymphocytes and promote an immunosuppressive environment.
Despite these mechanistic insights, most findings derive from animal or experimental studies. In humans, the relationship between psychological stress and skin cancers remains to be clarified through large-scale clinical research.